Top value mutual funds in India
Ranked by 7-year rolling returns, downside risk, and consistency — not recent returns alone.
Fund Name
7yr Rolling Returns
Risk of Below FD Returns
Consistency Of Performance

Hsbc Value Fund
17%
Medium
Strong
16 years old

Jm Value Fund
17%
Medium
Good
29 years old

Nippon India Value Fund
17%
Medium
Good
21 years old

Icici Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)
17%
High
Good
22 years old

Axis Value Fund
-
Very Low
Strong
4 years old
All 22 value funds are loaded — tap to expand
How these funds are ranked
Value funds invest in stocks trading below their intrinsic value. DrFin ranks them on rolling returns, downside risk, and consistency — so you find value managers who deliver across cycles, not just one-time picks.
Average across all 7-year windows since Jan 2015 — not start-to-today
% of 3-year periods where returns fell below a fixed deposit (7%)
How often each fund ranked in the top half of its value peers
Older funds have more data across market cycles — more reliable signals
Value funds invest in stocks trading below their estimated intrinsic value, aiming to profit when the market eventually recognises their worth.
Value funds carry Medium risk.
Historically, the worst peak-to-trough fall in this category has been around 41%, with an average market correction fall of 26% (vs 21% for the benchmark). Recovery from major falls has taken around 22 months on average.
Investors holding Value funds for 3 years earned less than FD returns in approximately 15% of periods. Longer holding periods significantly reduce this risk.
Across all rolling 5-year periods, Value funds delivered:
•
Typical (average) return: 16% p.a.
•
Best historical outcome: 33% p.a.
•
Worst historical outcome: -1% p.a.
The probability of earning less than FD returns over a 3-year period has historically been 15%.
Recent trailing returns can be misleading — use the full range of historical rolling returns for a realistic picture.
The minimum recommended holding period for Value funds is 5+ years.
Historically, the probability of earning less than FD returns decreased significantly with longer holding periods:
•
3 years: 15% chance of below-FD return
•
5 years: 8% chance of below-FD return
•
7 years: 0% chance of below-FD return
Investors who cannot commit to at least 5+ years should consider lower-risk alternatives.
The most common mistake: picking the fund with the highest 1- or 3-year return. Recent returns are heavily influenced by timing, not skill.
What to look for instead:
•
Rolling return consistency: how did the fund perform across all periods, not just the recent window?
•
Downside protection: how much does the fund fall during market corrections? Look at maximum drawdown and downside capture.
•
Benchmark consistency: what % of rolling periods did the fund beat its benchmark?
•
Expense ratio: for active funds, prefer below 1.5%; index funds typically charge 0.1–0.2%
•
AUM and track record: prefer funds with ₹500+ crore AUM and 7+ years of history
What to avoid:
•
Chasing the top-ranked fund from last year
•
Selecting based on star ratings alone — ratings lag and change
•
Ignoring the expense ratio in long-term compounding
Home
Find Fund
Portfolio
Fund Detail
Compare